• Login
    View Item 
    •   Repository Home
    • 02. Theses
    • Global Campus Europe: EMA
    • View Item
    •   Repository Home
    • 02. Theses
    • Global Campus Europe: EMA
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An uneasy decade: examination of the first ten years of explicit interaction between human rights law and the ICSID Investor-State Arbitration Tribunals

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ToC (404.9Kb)
    Fulltext under request to the author (879.5Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Zbona, Ana
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The investor – state tribunals have gone from attempting to give effective protection to investors’ rights for scarce, individual complaints to addressing fundamental questions about state measures taken for public purpose. Investor-state arbitration has come under great criticism in the recent years for allegedly overly constricting the states’ ability to regulate in public interest. Drawing on a wide array of case law, this thesis evaluates how the limits of investor protection have been understood by the investor-state tribunals under the auspices of the ICSID over the past ten years, to assess what that means in the light of human rights obligations of the states and to review how successful the implemented reforms of the system were and are likely to be in increasing the human rights considerations in the ICSID system.
    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
    https://doi.org/20.500.11825/655
    Collections
    • Global Campus Europe: EMA

    Global Campus Open Knowledge Repository copyright © 2002-2019 
    Contact Us | Feedback | Global Campus of Human Rights
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Global Campus Open Knowledge Repository copyright © 2002-2019 
    Contact Us | Feedback | Global Campus of Human Rights