(Un)justified interventionism of the ECtHR in the execution process? From declaratory judgments to indications of non-monetary measures

dc.contributor.advisor Benoît-Rohmer, Florence
dc.contributor.author Alting von Geusau, Maria-Christine
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-20T16:06:07Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-20T16:06:07Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.description Second semester University: Université de Strasbourg en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis will mainly explore the evolving role of the European Court of Human Rights towards the indication of non-financial remedial measures in Court judgments in order to provide redress to successful applicants that found a violation of their rights under the European Convention of Human Rights and/or its Protocols. The purpose of this study is to clarify the Court’s ambiguous standpoint with regard to nonfinancial remedial measures and to propose solutions to as how the Court can enhance implementation of judgments, without stepping beyond the boundaries of its given powers by the Convention. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/20.500.11825/805
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/2134
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Global Campus Europe (EMA) theses 2017/2018;
dc.subject European Court of Human Rights en_US
dc.subject judgement en_US
dc.subject remedies en_US
dc.title (Un)justified interventionism of the ECtHR in the execution process? From declaratory judgments to indications of non-monetary measures en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Alting von Geusau.pdf
Size:
829.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Fulltext thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: