Global Campus Open Knowledge Repository

Our Open Knowledge Repository is a digital service that collects, preserves, and distributes all digital materials resulting from the rich and varied production of the Global Campus of Human Rights. It is an ever growing collection which aims to give visibility to our research outputs, educational content, and multimedia materials; sustain open access for knowledge transfer; and foster communication within and beyond academia.

 

Communities in DSpace

Select a community to browse its collections.

Now showing 1 - 5 of 7

Recent Submissions

Item
Deconstructing Border Walls: Tackling the Dominican Republic’s anti-Haitian racism
(Global Campus of Human Rights, 2023-03-23) Fernandez, Ezequiel
Haitian migration to the Dominican Republic has been marked by a long history of inequalities and human rights violations. Construction of a 160km wall dividing the two countries is the latest physical manifestation of the barriers this immigrant population faces.
Item
Child Participation at the Global Campus. Strengthening Child and Youth Leadership Worldwide
(Global Campus of Human Rights, 2026) [...]; GC Children's Rights Department; Pegoraro, Manuela; Brunetta, Carlotta
At an international child-led conference in January 2022, originally planned as an in-person event but held online due to the COVID-19 pandemic, children and young people came together to share their views, experiences and ideas. When the event ended, they did not want the exchange to stop. They wanted to stay connected, to keep working together and to turn their ideas into action. From that moment, the Global Campus Child Leadership Team (CLT) began to take shape. Since then, something remarkable has grown. Across regions and contexts, national Child Leadership Teams, under the umbrella of the global CLT, have developed into a community of children aged 12-17 who are identifying the issues that matter to them, creating their own projects and advocating for change in their communities and beyond. This publication is an attempt to capture a part of that journey. It takes the form of a tree. The branches represent the different themes the CLTs are working on, while the leaves show some of the many projects that have grown from them. Each leaf reflects an idea brought to life—shaped and led by children and young people themselves. Like the work it represents, this publication is not finished. It is a living tree. New leaves will be added as new projects emerge, and we hope to continue shaping and improving it over time, including through the feedback we receive. What stands out most is the energy and commitment of the children and young people involved. They are not just participating—they are taking initiative, setting priorities and creating spaces for change. Alongside them are the people who support and accompany this work in different ways, helping to create the conditions for participation and growth. There is a great deal to learn from what is being built together. At the same time, this work is still evolving. We are constantly learning about the challenges and constraints that come with enabling meaningful child participation, and about how we can do better. Being open about this, and continuing the dialogue with the children and young people involved in the CLTs and the Youth Advisory Group (YAG), is an essential part of the process. We hope this publication offers something to everyone who reads it - child or adult. We hope it sparks ideas, raises questions and shows what is possible when children are supported to take the lead. And we hope it invites you to learn more about the work that continues to grow from here.
Thumbnail Image
Item
Beyond capacity or below obligation? Why Rohingya girls are excluded from education in Bangladesh
(Global Campus of Human Rights, 2026-05-07) Abid, Fahim Abrar
Bangladesh hosts the world's largest Rohingya refugee population yet has no refugee law. Viewing the camp education system through an intersectional CRC lens reveals that Rohingya adolescent girls' exclusion from post-primary education is a governance choice that constitutes structural discrimination.
Thumbnail Image
Item
To Be or Not to Be Neuroenhanced? Personal Identity under Siege in the Age of AI-powered Neurotechnology
(Global Campus of Human Rights, 2025) Castro, Clara : Nogueira de Sá Rosas de; Murphy, Thérèse
Recent advances in neurotechnology and artificial intelligence have expanded the potential to influence brain function beyond traditional medical applications to the enhancement of healthy individuals. Growing investment in consumer neurotech and experimental brain-computer interfaces signals a future where we may be able to substantially improve our cognitive and emotional capabilities – a prospect that raises profound ethical and legal concerns. Central to these concerns is the question of how neuroenhancement technologies may impact personal identity. The brain is often regarded not just as a biological system, but as the foundation of who we are – shaping our experiences, guiding our decisions and anchoring our sense of self. As individuals voluntarily engage with advanced technologies intended to modulate their cognition and emotions, they may disrupt their psychological continuity. This indicates far-reaching consequences, not just for the person undergoing neuroenhancement but for society at large. International bodies such as UNESCO and the Council of Europe have begun to discuss and address these risks, yet current governance frameworks remain ill-equipped for the complex and specific scenarios posed by non-therapeutic neuroenhancement. Against this backdrop, this thesis examines whether and to what extent limits should be placed on individual voluntary engagement with neuroenhancement technologies in order to safeguard personal identity. Using an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates philosophical, ethical and legal perspectives, this thesis seeks to contribute to the growing discourse on neurotechnology governance, advocating for a human-rights based and forward-looking approach.
Thumbnail Image
Item
The Security-Democracy Trade-Off? EU Policies and Civic Space in Morocco
(Global Campus of Human Rights, 2025) Murillas García, Itziar; Koff, Harlan
This study critically examines how the securitisation of EU external policy in Morocco affects the country’s prospects for democratisation. It places civil society at the centre of the analysis, framing it as a key actor in bottom-up democratic transformation. The research argues that the EU’s securitised agenda undermines these efforts by reinforcing authoritarian practices and constraining the development of a genuinely free and independent civic space. This occurs primarily through the instrumentalisation of civil society engagement mechanisms to implement EU migration objectives, and through the marginalisation of critical or politically sensitive actors whose involvement might jeopardise stable relations with the Moroccan government. The study draws on critical literature and document analysis to explore the intersection between the EU’s strategic interests and its normative claims in Morocco, alongside an assessment of the country’s associational landscape. It also presents a case study based on fieldwork in the Melilla-Nador border region, incorporating interviews with civil society representatives. These local perspectives shed light on how EU actions are perceived on the ground, and how civil society actors interpret the dynamics of democratisation, securitisation and migration governance.