Are smart walls smart solutions? The impact of technologically-charged borders on human rights in Europe

dc.contributor.author Kieran, Bronagh
dc.contributor.author Amorós Cascales, Fuensanta
dc.contributor.author Thomi, Laura
dc.contributor.author Veit, Meredith
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-02T13:17:44Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-02T13:17:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract This article reviews new technologies on the external border of the European Union, and the human rights ramifications of these developments. It utilises a multi-disciplinary approach, writing on the emerging technologies themselves, their impact on vulnerable groups, legal developments relating to privacy, and the political context informing migration policy. The first part outlines emerging trends in border technology. The discussion relies on examples beyond the European Union to inform its analysis, including case studies from the United States border with Mexico. Technological developments considered include thermal imaging; biometric data; virtual reality; artificial intelligence; and drones. The second part explores how vulnerable groups will be affected by the collection of biometrics at the external border of the European Union. This part explores how algorithms, far from being objective arbiters, in fact are repositories for the bias of the manufacturer. The article postulates that to tackle the proliferation of bias, it is necessary to have a diverse workforce creating these systems. Third, the article addresses the regulatory framework on data privacy in the European Union. The significance of a right to privacy post-9/11 context is described. The conception of data privacy of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is set out. This part first analyses how GDPR has affected the processing and storage of data in the EU and, second, draws out the implications for the data of migrants. Special emphasis is placed on the concept of consent, and the ability of migrants to refuse the collection of their data is put into question. Finally, the article turns to the political context. Arguing that right-wing populism is not inherently opposed to new technologies, the article points to populists’ reliance on social media to garner support. Furthermore, it is advanced that the potential for migrants’ human rights to be impinged by new technologies is compounded by the influence of right-wing populism on migration policy. Key words: smart borders; surveillance; consent; privacy; biometrics; human rights; vulnerable groups; securitisation; technology; artificial intelligence en_US
dc.identifier.citation B Kieran, FA Cascales, L Thomi & M Veit ‘Are smart walls smart solutions? The impact of technologicallycharged borders on human rights in Europe’ (2019) 3 Global Campus Human Rights Journal 173-209 http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/483
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/483
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Global Campus of Human Rights en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Global Campus Human Rights Journal;3.2
dc.subject surveillance en_US
dc.subject privacy en_US
dc.subject human rights en_US
dc.subject security en_US
dc.subject technological innovation en_US
dc.subject boundaries en_US
dc.subject Europe en_US
dc.subject migrations en_US
dc.subject consent en_US
dc.subject European Union en_US
dc.subject data protection en_US
dc.title Are smart walls smart solutions? The impact of technologically-charged borders on human rights in Europe en_US
dc.type Article en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
4.Global article EMA_2_2019.pdf
Size:
586.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Europe_focus_GCHRJ_3.2(2019)
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections