The role of human rights in the EU’s external action in the Eastern Partnership, the Southern Neighbourhood and in Sub-Saharan Africa

dc.contributor.authorDunay, Pál
dc.contributor.authorEkeke, Alex
dc.contributor.authorGhazaryan, Narine
dc.contributor.authorGunn, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorHuszka, Beáta
dc.contributor.authorKillander, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorNkrumah, Bright
dc.contributor.authorKörtvélyesi, Zsolt
dc.contributor.authorRácz, András
dc.contributor.authorBalogh, László
dc.contributor.authorHalász, Péter
dc.contributor.authorKopper, Ákos
dc.contributor.authorMajtényi, Balázs
dc.contributor.authorNagy, Alíz
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T15:20:32Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T15:20:32Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.description.abstractThis report discusses the role of human rights in the EU’s policy to the Eastern Partnership countries, the southern neighbours and the sub-Saharan African states. It builds on the first report of FRAME Work Package 6 – Deliverable 6.1 – which gave an overview of the types of instruments used in human rights promotion in the EU’s external action. This study faces a major challenge that stems from the scope of the field of analysis. It extends to many partners of the EU. The number of states is above 60. However, they do not belong in the same category as far as the intensity of their relations and hence their importance for the EU. There is reason to divide the state partners into three groups: 1. states of the Eastern Partnership; 2. states of the southern neighbourhood, and 3. the states of sub-Saharan Africa. Beyond the elementary grouping, states matter based on their economic and political weight and their willingness/readiness to cooperate with the EU. The three groups are also different as far as the perspective of their relations with the EU. It is clear that the states of the Eastern Partnership and southern neighbourhood matter more for the EU than sub-Saharan Africa as a whole by the intensity of relations. […] The study consists of three main parts: I. Introduction underlining the evolution of human rights in the external relations of the EU. II. The case studies that offer detailed analysis how the EU’s interaction with states and various regions has evolved. III. Conclusions are drawn from the case studies.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/20.500.11825/113
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25330/1554
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFRAMEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDeliverable 6;3
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectforeign policyen_US
dc.subjectEastern Europe countriesen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Eastern countriesen_US
dc.subjectNorth African countriesen_US
dc.subjectsub-Saharan regionen_US
dc.titleThe role of human rights in the EU’s external action in the Eastern Partnership, the Southern Neighbourhood and in Sub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FRAME -- Deliverable 6.3 -- Submitted 30 September 2016.pdf
Size:
6.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: