Austerity at what cost? : a comparative analysis of the protective standards of economic, social and cultural rights during economic crisis
MetadataShow full item record
The economic crisis of 2008 had a severe impact on the economic, social and cultural rights of people, which was aggravated by the responses taken by the affected states, including a variety of austerity measures that focused on public expenditure cuts, tax raises and labor law reforms. Not a long time after the adoption of such measures, the responsible bodies for the protection of human rights were called to decide on cases where those measures were impugned as violating people‟s rights. This research examines the criteria employed by three bodies, namely the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the European Committee of Social Rights and the European Court of Human Rights. First, it analyzes the criteria‟s theoretical framework and their application by the relevant bodies, identifying the bodies‟ strengths and weaknesses, the latter mainly relating to the adoption or not of the crisis and emergency narratives. While several similarities are observed in their approach, the research also engages in identifying certain differences in the way they handle crisis-related cases, differences that have impacted the protection of rights. Finally, it concludes with several identified gaps in the protection system that require more attention in order for economic, social and cultural rights to be protected effectively during economic crises.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/20.500.11825/1146
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Ohl, Tara Caroline (2015)This research started by analysing the flaws in the fundamental rights framework within the European Union. It examined its relation to the European Convention of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights, and ...
Civil, political, social and economic rights : branches of the same tree. Promises and perspectives of genuine public deliberation through an analysis of predeliberative conditions in Sens theory Ghellinck, Isabelle : de (2011)This thesis deals with Sen's Capability Approach coupled with his work on public reason. The aim is to understand if the effective use of public reason and the genuine freedom to participate in public deliberation require ...