Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTerragni, Martinianoen
dc.contributor.authorComas, Rocio
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-09T09:34:18Z
dc.date.available2017-09-09T09:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/20.500.11825/49
dc.descriptionLATMA - Master’s Degree Programme in Human Rights and Democratisation in Latin America and the Caribbean, University of San Martin (Buenos Aires)en
dc.descriptionGlobal Campus - Latin America-Caribbean
dc.description.abstractThis study looks at the application of house arrest in case law after the reform of Law No. 24,660 on the enforcement of deprivation of freedom in Argentina. This change increases the number of cases in which confinement is moderated, such as when pregnant women and/or mothers of children under the age of five are involved. This study analyses Ana María Fernández’s request for house arrest by interpreting the arguments made by judicial officers using three main tools: gender perspective, the best interests of the child and the hermeneutics of human rights.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGlobal Campusen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Campus awarded theses 2014/2015
dc.subjectchildren rightsen_US
dc.subjectadministration of justiceen_US
dc.subjectArgentinaen_US
dc.subjectdetentionen_US
dc.subjectFernández, Ana Maríaen_US
dc.titleGender invisibility and the best interests of the child in the administration of justice: analysis of the request for house arrest by Ana María Fernándezen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record