Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKlabbers, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBonadiman, Luca
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T12:35:30Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T12:35:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/20.500.11825/670
dc.descriptionSecond semester University: University of Helsinki.en_US
dc.description.abstractThere are two opposed directions, namely the nature of the object and the ontology of law, that meet in the moment of reality of law. Intellectual Property is a particular type of object, the nature of which is difficult to adequately inquire; the inquiry is crucial for the adherence of law to the reality given as such, as well as for the socio-historical context that defines the political understanding of the object given in the form of law. Law has become incapable of thinking itself exhaustively; there are no efforts in measuring the degree of legitimacy of its assumptions. Therefore, law is the equivalent of an order issued through formally correct procedures and having the force of obliging people to its respect. Yet, the legislator shall not impose impossible commands that follow an ideal order detached from the given one. Intellectual Property does not genuinely constitute an element that its same genetic naturalness would permit to translate into juridical categories. Law is incapable to absorb Intellectual Property and the same credibility of law is at risk: it is all about force/violence of the system to impose effectiveness. The reading of the complex phenomenology of Intellectual Property Rights permits their own hermeneutic.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEMA theses 2011/2012;8
dc.subjectintellectual propertyen_US
dc.titleA hermeneutic of intellectual property rights: theory, law, and economy : defending the essence and dignity of human rightsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record