Labour rights, artificial intelligence and automation in the context of the UK, Brexit, and Covid-19 with a comparative study of Singapore

dc.contributor.advisorPerulli, Adalberto
dc.contributor.authorHiggs, Lillian
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T11:05:46Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T11:05:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionSecond semester University: Ca' Foscari University of Veniceen_US
dc.description.abstractThe impact of Artificial Intelligence and automation presents an unprecedented challenge to workers’ rights. The potential automation crisis in UK can lead to further problems in social justice and income inequality beyond job retention. The UK sits in a unique human rights position due to its ongoing process of legal sovereignty post-Brexit and the economic challenges presented by Covid-19. The question posed here is can British sovereignty be used to strengthen labour rights rather than threaten judicial independence in the UK? And does its altruistic response to Covid-19 bode well for the future of labour policy in the UK? By addressing the effect of Artificial intelligence as a direct human rights issue there is the opportunity to depoliticise solutions to labour displacement, such as increases in trade union power, strengthened labour policy and government funded lifelong learning, creating a New Social Contract. Automation naturally leads to the devolution of the traditional working environment and a rise in the gig economy which leads to deregulation and de-unionisation, a reinvention of the traditional trade union structure is necessary to accommodate the new forms of unstable work. Trade unions play a key role in securing Britain’s future and in the new classification of subordinate workers. Monopolisation of the markets is the likely occurrence when BigTech replaces human labour, causing Small and Mid-size enterprises (SME) to fail. This can lead to unfair pricing and low wages with little protection for skilled and non-skilled workers. Making automation and a universal progressive tax structure, a key human rights issue is therefore pertinent so that the UK can correctly address these issues before the exploitation of its citizens. Comparing the UK’s approach to automation to Singapore, the country predicted to have the lowest rate of job at high-risk of computerisation shows that a heightened focus on lifelong learning is key to positively fulfilling the human right to work. The UK must positively fulfil their human rights obligations by improving the futures of the labour force.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11825/1784
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25330/687
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Campus Europe (EMA) theses 2019/2020;
dc.subjectlabour lawen_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subjectworkersen_US
dc.subjecttrade unionsen_US
dc.subjecttechnological innovationsen_US
dc.subjectlabour marketen_US
dc.subjectSingaporeen_US
dc.subjectcomparative politicsen_US
dc.subjecthuman rightsen_US
dc.subjecteducationen_US
dc.titleLabour rights, artificial intelligence and automation in the context of the UK, Brexit, and Covid-19 with a comparative study of Singaporeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Higgs Lillian.pdf
Size:
745.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full text thesis

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: