Diaspora and democratisation: Diversity of impact in Eastern Partnership countries

dc.contributor.authorAleksanyan, Arusyak
dc.contributor.authorBejanyan, Varduhi
dc.contributor.authorDodon, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorMaksimenko, Katsiaryna
dc.contributor.authorSimonian, Agabeg
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T13:09:16Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T13:09:16Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T11:32:09Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T11:35:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractAround the world diasporas are important role players, and they make a significant contribution towards democracy-building processes in their homelands. The advantages of cooperation with diasporas in the sphere of democratisation are substantial. Diasporas display behavioural diversity and invest both financial and non-financial resources and values to enhance democratic governance and policy-making processes, to ensure social welfare and economic growth, to protect human rights and to establish civil society and the rule of law in their homelands. This article explores the influence of diasporas on democratisation in Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries from a comparative perspective. Diasporas originating from the six EaP countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) differ in scope, factors of influence on the democracy-building processes, and impact opportunities on government policies in both their homelands and countries of residence. At the same time, there are many similarities between these countries. Until 1991 these countries had limited ties with diasporas as they were Republics of the Soviet Union. All these countries experienced territorial conflicts, except for Belarus. Having different levels of democracy, they are involved in the EaP initiative aimed at sharing democratic values. From this point of view, it is of great interest to explore the diversity of the diasporas’ impact on the democracy-building processes in the mentioned countries. The article provides an understanding and comparative analysis of the variety in diasporas’ engagement in democratisation of homelands in EaP countries. Based on the findings, the authors argue that the diasporas of these countries have different impact levels on democracy. Moreover, they conclude that the democracy level in turn influences the countries’ diaspora policies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationA Aleksanyan, V Bejanyan, C Dodon, K Maksimenko & A Simonian ‘Diaspora and democratisation: Diversity of impact in Eastern Partnership countries’ (2019) 3 Global Campus Human Rights Journal 96-112 http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/1427
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.gchumanrights.org/handle/20.500.11825/993.3
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25330/1427
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGlobal Campusen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Campus Human Rights Journal;3.1
dc.subjectmigrationsen_US
dc.subjectEastern Partenrship countriesen_US
dc.subjectdemocracyen_US
dc.subjectcomparative politicsen_US
dc.subjectdiaspora
dc.titleDiaspora and democratisation: Diversity of impact in Eastern Partnership countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
08.Eastern_Partnership_GCHRJ_3.1.pdf
Size:
441.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Eastern_Partnership_GCHRJ_3.1(2019)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections

Version History

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
VersionDateSummary
3*
2023-01-24 17:35:36
doi_up
* Selected version