Restrictive migration strategies: a study of externalization taxonomy of policies and impacts on protection seekers and analysis of the Italy-Albania agreement

dc.contributor.advisorDe Stefani, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorOhanian, Natalia
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-24T14:57:48Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.descriptionSecond semester University: University of Padua
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the externalization of migration management has become an increasingly common practice among Global North states seeking to manage migration flows by relocating aspects of their responsibility for processing asylum claims beyond their territory. Despite its growing relevance, there is no consensus definition of the term. Moreover, the concept is primarily discussed in academic literature, the media, reports by non-governmental organizations, and some international organizations. It is notably absent from governmental discourse and is not formally recognized in either international or domestic legislation, making the phenomenon particularly difficult to define and study. This thesis addresses this conceptual gap by reviewing the existing literature on externalization with the aim of developing a comprehensive and operational definition of the concept. It then assesses whether Italy’s recent attempts to carry out asylum procedures in Albania constitutes or not a form of externalization, by applying the proposed framework to the Italy–Albania Agreement signed in 2023 to determine if it can be classified as an externalization measure. The findings of this research are twofold. First, the study develops a comprehensive and practical framework for conceptualizing migration externalization. Second, the analysis demonstrates that the Italy–Albania Agreement can indeed be classified as a form of externalization, although it represents a novel variation of the concept. Two distinctive features characterize this model: the instrumentalization of the Safe Country of Origin concept as a filtering and non-entry mechanism, and the reliance on an ambiguous legal framework that weakens procedural safeguards and creates conditions that may ultimately jeopardize substantive rights, including the right to seek asylum. Key words: Externalization, legal responsibility, asylum processing, Italy-Albania Agreement, safe country of origin, procedural rights.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.gchumanrights.org/handle/20.500.11825/3408
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25330/3311
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Campus Europe (EMA) theses 2025/2026
dc.subjectmigration policy
dc.subjectasylum
dc.subjectItaly
dc.subjectAlbania
dc.subjectextraterritoriality
dc.titleRestrictive migration strategies: a study of externalization taxonomy of policies and impacts on protection seekers and analysis of the Italy-Albania agreement
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Ohanian Castello.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full text thesis

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
18.68 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: