Contemporary trends within the European constitutional developments and their reflection in the constitution of the EU : an analysis of functioning of national parliaments at the European level and the problem of democratic deficit

dc.contributor.advisor Weerts, Laurence
dc.contributor.advisor Docquir, Pierre-François
dc.contributor.author Abrahamyan, Marsel
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-24T12:49:16Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-24T12:49:16Z
dc.date.issued 2005
dc.description Second semester University: Université Libre de Bruxelles. en_US
dc.description.abstract If one agrees that there should be a democracy in the Union, another question immediately arising what is the democratic element of the institutional settlement of the EU? Should the democratic paradigm of the Union be achieved by enhancing the role of the EP or the National Parliaments of the Member States, or as it is drafted in the Constitutional Treaty (principle of representative democracy), both? It is widely conceived that the democracy is far from being the reserved organising principle of the modern nation-state. Furthermore, since the 1970s, it has been acknowledged that it is an organising principle for other societal structures too. Hence, as it is argued in the thesis, what kind of democracy for the sui generis EU could be best suited? Would it be plausible to apply the very same democratic standards of the nation-state or it would be misguided? In addition, there are some likely models, such as consensus or consociational, regulatory, deliberative, parliamentary (post-parliamentary), which one might fit to the institutional structure of the EU. On the other hand, the problem of democracy is inextricably intertwined with the issue of ‘Demos’. Would it be possible to build democracy without ethno-culturally strictly defined notion of the latter? It is pointed out that a ‘European Demos’ is not a prerequisite but an outcome of European integration. The second point, which is inextricably linked with democracy, is the deficit of the latter. What kind of deficit is available on the European level? Could it be alleviated injecting more doses of representative democracy onto that level, deploying two parliamentary tanks namely, National Parliaments and the European Parliament, thus avoiding to use the standard model of representative (parliamentary) democracy. The new Constitutional Treaty would endow with this opportunity to embed the principle of dual legitimacy, making NPs from national to strong multilevel players. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11825/1542
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/448
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries EMA theses 2004/2005;1
dc.subject democracy en_US
dc.subject European Union en_US
dc.subject legislative bodies en_US
dc.subject parliament en_US
dc.title Contemporary trends within the European constitutional developments and their reflection in the constitution of the EU : an analysis of functioning of national parliaments at the European level and the problem of democratic deficit en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ABRAHAMYAN Marsel.pdf
Size:
714.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
full text not available
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: