(Un)justified interventionism of the ECtHR in the execution process? From declaratory judgments to indications of non-monetary measures

dc.contributor.advisorBenoît-Rohmer, Florence
dc.contributor.authorAlting von Geusau, Maria-Christine
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T16:06:07Z
dc.date.available2018-12-20T16:06:07Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionSecond semester University: Université de Strasbourgen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis will mainly explore the evolving role of the European Court of Human Rights towards the indication of non-financial remedial measures in Court judgments in order to provide redress to successful applicants that found a violation of their rights under the European Convention of Human Rights and/or its Protocols. The purpose of this study is to clarify the Court’s ambiguous standpoint with regard to nonfinancial remedial measures and to propose solutions to as how the Court can enhance implementation of judgments, without stepping beyond the boundaries of its given powers by the Convention.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/20.500.11825/805
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25330/2134
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Campus Europe (EMA) theses 2017/2018;
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Human Rightsen_US
dc.subjectjudgementen_US
dc.subjectremediesen_US
dc.title(Un)justified interventionism of the ECtHR in the execution process? From declaratory judgments to indications of non-monetary measuresen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Alting von Geusau.pdf
Size:
829.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Fulltext thesis

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: