Preimplantation Genetic Testing: the Conflict between Reproductive Autonomy and Disability Rights. With the UK, Ireland, and Portugal as Case Studies.
Preimplantation Genetic Testing: the Conflict between Reproductive Autonomy and Disability Rights. With the UK, Ireland, and Portugal as Case Studies.
Date
2022
Authors
Keogh, Bríana
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Global Campus of Human Rights
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing allows parents who are at risk of passing
on a serious genetic disability or illness to avoid implanting embryos with
genetic abnormalities when going through IVF. In the UK and Portugal, this
is publicly funded and limited to ‘serious’ genetic abnormalities only, whereas
in Ireland there are no national regulations. At first glance, selecting against
genetic abnormalities is a justifiable aim in the name of public health and
avoidance of human suffering. In addition to this, reproductive autonomy
is an important bioethical principle and control over one’s private and
family life is commonly recognised as essential for human flourishing within
a liberal society. However, if we do not remember our history we may be
doomed to repeat it. Objectively harmful eugenic policies of the 20th century
advocated for the eradication of disability in order to improve the strength
of humankind. This traumatic history continues to create fear amongst the
disability community for the return of stigmatisation, discrimination and
reduced funding for services. However, the reality is that raising a child with
a disability correlates with economic, social and mental strains. Should we,
therefore, set limits on an individual’s ability to avoid these strains, so we can
protect human diversity and the rights of persons with disabilities? If we truly
respect reproductive autonomy and the value of disability in our communities
then why is it considered immoral to deliberately select an embryo with the
gene for deafness? Whilst the majority of disability is attributed to non-genetic
factors and therefore the eradication of disability is impossible, grave damage
can still be done to our tolerance for human variation and the inherent human
dignity regardless of one’s genetic constitution.
Contains ableist language and remarks.
Description
Second semester University: New University of Lisbon.
Keywords
bioethics,
genetics,
reproductive rights,
dignity,
people with disabilities,
discrimination against people with disabilities,
Ireland,
Portugal,
United Kingdom,
case studies