Intractable conflicts in Africa: The international response to the Darfur and South Sudan crises

dc.contributor.author Owiso, Roger
dc.contributor.author Boshoff, Elsabé
dc.contributor.author Mamhare, Tapiwa Matemai
dc.contributor.author Tsighe, Adiam Zemenfes
dc.date.accessioned 2018-02-22T15:57:29Z
dc.date.available 2018-02-22T15:57:29Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-26T14:42:42Z
dc.date.issued 2017-12
dc.description.abstract This article considers the intractable conflicts and human rights situations in Darfur, Sudan and South Sudan, respectively, against the international responses they elicited. Intractable conflicts are conflicts that have lasted for a long time with resistance to settlement despite various attempts at intervention and conciliation. These conflicts from neighbouring nations have both elicited extensive engagement from the international and regional communities but, while some clarity regarding the direction to be taken has been achieved in the case of South Sudan, the situation in Darfur remains dire. The article analyses the difference in the peace-building approaches in the two conflicts and how these approaches have contributed to the different outcomes in Darfur and South Sudan. Following an exposition of intractability in the introduction, the second section applies the factors identified to the case of Darfur, confirming that this indeed is an intractable situation. It then considers the international response to the conflict in Darfur and the mechanisms employed by the global and the regional community in an attempt to address this conflict. The third section considers the situation in South Sudan and the international response, noting that efforts were led by the regional and subregional bodies, with the UN’s role being to complement these efforts. The methodology employed is a comparative analysis, in which the international and regional legal and institutional responses to the crisis in South Sudan are analysed with a view to identifying the lessons to be applied in addressing the situation in Darfur, utilising theoretical and functional approaches to legal and political interventions. The final section draws from the insights gained in comparing the international response in Darfur and South Sudan, and concludes by attempting to extract general principles about intractability and the effectiveness of international responses to situations considered to be intractable, noting in particular the importance of regional and sub-regional bodies taking the lead in efforts to resolve intractable conflicts. Key words: conflict; intractability; human rights; South Sudan; Darfur en_US
dc.identifier.citation R Owiso, E Boshoff, TM Mamhare & AZ Tsighe ‘Intractable conflicts in Africa: The international response to the Darfur and South Sudan crises’ (2017) 1 Global Campus Human Rights Journal 287 http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/1459
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.gchumanrights.org/handle/20.500.11825/428.2
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.25330/1459
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Global Campus en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Volume;1;2
dc.subject conflict en_US
dc.subject human rights en_US
dc.subject Darfur en_US
dc.subject intractability en_US
dc.subject Sudan en_US
dc.subject South Sudan en_US
dc.title Intractable conflicts in Africa: The international response to the Darfur and South Sudan crises en_US
dc.type Article en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
05_art._GC_ Journal_2017_2.pdf
Size:
210.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Owiso_et_al._GCHRJ_1.2(2017)
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections

Version History

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Version Editor Date Summary
2 *
2023-01-26 14:42:23
doi_update
* Selected version